Independent. Uncensored. | Investigative Reports from US and around the world.

FEATURED STORIES, news

The Events Leading up to Comey’s Dramatic Firing and the Resulting Chaos

Posted: May 11, 2017 at 4:38 pm   /   by   /   comments (0)

It has been just over 36 hours since now-former FBI Director James Comey was fired and the move has sparked unprecedented chaos in the U.S. and around the world. For the umpteenth time in the past year, there’s been a suspiciously timed announcement, but this time, there’s an immediate tsunami of speculation for his firing – drawing comparisons to President Nixon’s Saturday Night Massacre and head Democratic Senators crying cover up.

The Timeline leading up to Comey’s firing:

  • June 5, 2016 Comey announced that Hillary Clinton would not be criminally charged in relation to her recklessly set an up email server. As would be expected, Comey was cheered by liberals and lambasted by conservatives. At the time, Trump was not a fan of Comey, and called for a special prosecutor to replace him.

  • October 28, 2016 Infamously, Comey announced that they have new information about Hillary Clinton’s email server which would result in the reopening of the F.B.I.’s case against her merely a week and a half before the election. The opinions on Comey took one of its many one-eighty degree turns, with Democrats eventually blaming Comey for Clinton’s eventual loss, and Republicans and Trump celebrating his “courage.”

A week later, Comey said that they were still not pursuing a criminal investigation against Clinton and shut the case again, only a few days before the election.

  • January 24, 2017 Trump announces that Comey is staying on as FBI Director. This announcement comes after the FBI’s agreed publically with the CIA that Russians hacked the election, and Comey reportedly briefed Trump on the dossier that the Russians compiled against him. Despite that, Trump was seen patting Comey on the back, and seemed on good terms with the FBI Director.

  • March 20, 2017 Comey testifies that the FBI had an open probe into collusion between Trump and the Russian government during the 2016 election, while rebuffing Trump’s claim that President Obama had Trump Tower wiretapped. By April, Trump’s relationship and opinion of the director had seemingly soured, and while he said in an interview with Fox Business that while he had “confidence” in Comey, he acknowledged that it was “not too late to fire him.”

  • May 3, 2017 Comey testifies in front of a Senate Judiciary Committee about why he made announced a reopening of Clinton’s email case on October 28. It was revealed that Comey revealed the information after it was learned that Huma Abedin was forwarding some of Clinton’s classified emails to husband, Anthony Weiner. He also warned against Russians interferences in future elections, while giving scant details about the FBI’s investigation into Trump’s collusion with the Russians.

  • May 9, 2017 It’s revealed that Comey misstated and exaggerated the extent to which Abedin forwarded emails to her husband. Comey fixes his statement. Trump then  fires Comey with the backing of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

A Dangerous Narrative

A cursory glance at the timeline would imply a very dangerous narrative. Comey announced he was leading an FBI investigation into Trump’s collusion with Russia, he testified about it, and then Trump fired him. That’s about as suspicious of a cover up as you can get.

Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-Ny.) minced no words on the suspicion of a cover up, and forcefully recommended a special prosecutor for the Russian investigation shortly after the firing was announced, noting the “deeply troubling pattern” of behavior from the White House.

Schumer cited the Trump administration’s similarly abrupt removal of former acting Attorney General Sally Yates and former U.S. attorney Preet Bharara, both of whom were also in charge of investigating the Trump campaign.

As with the firing of Yates and Bharara, Comey’s firing seems impulsive, and initial reports out of White House suggest that the president asked the Justice Department and Attorney General Jeff Sessions to find a reason to fire the FBI Director after he testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Other reports have also suggested that the president has been enraged by the continued domination of the Russian investigation in the news. Sources say that Trump screams at the television when he sees clips about the probe, according to one advisor. The firing also came, incidentally or not incidentally, after Comey asked for more funds towards the Russian investigation.

The Administration’s Narrative

Indications that Trump wanted the Russian collusion story to get out of the news cycle are peppered throughout the Trump Administration’s defense of the firing, and even in the President’s letter to Comey.

“While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgement of the Department of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the Bureau,” Trump wrote.

Similarly, in the first press briefing since the firing, Deputy White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders expressed the administration’s desire for everyone to move on from the Russian collusion story.

Sanders also pointed out that Democrats were calling for Comey’s removal after the unpopular revealing of information before the election, and that the administration was surprised to find such an uproar given the public and bipartisan hatred for the FBI Director.

She also said that President Trump had been considering firing Comey since November 9th and that there had been an “erosion of confidence” in the months following the inauguration.

Rosenstein, by contrast, attributed Comey’s firing as the result of his decision not to pursue charges against Hillary Clinton in her email scandal, and that the decision had led to a lack of public confidence in the department.

So, that’s Trump Administration’s explanation for why FBI Director Comey was let go. Comey was wrong for not charging Clinton; Comey was disliked by lawmakers in both party; Comey was just doing a “bad job.”

And it’s true that Comey was disliked, but Trump doesn’t seem to realize that he’s disliked more.

Conclusion

Within just two full days since the firing, there’s been an ever-changing narrative. Unfortunately for the White House, their explanation for firing Comey doesn’t add up.

There’s too many confusions in the timeline. Too many plot holes in their explanation. Too many questionably timed announcements with conflicting interests. Too much.

Trump has made a living firing people that he has deemed disrespectful, and that helps explain the firing in some ways: Comey’s testimony was tantamount to betrayal, and just like he did in the campaign, and Trump is getting revenge on someone disloyal.

Whatever the intentions – as a foolhardy display of authoritarian strength or poorly devised cover up for working with – Comey’s firing continues a theme within the administration: poor optics.

Speaking of optics –  the day after firing Comey, President Trump and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson welcomed Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak into town for a meeting shut out from the press.

Steven Klett, Caracal Reports
Newsletter subscribe
giweather wordpress widget